Quality and Sustainability Criteria in Purchase Decisions of Teenagers

Engineering Design

Authors

  • H. Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Engineering Design, Austria
  • D. Collado Ruiz Integration of Design & Environmental Assessment, Universidad, Politécnica de Valencia, Spain

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2012.330024

Keywords:

Eco-products, Quality criteria, Market survey, Teenagers

Abstract

The raising sustainability awareness of consumers has brought the discourse about environmental impacts of products into pulic discourse. Industry has had to respond to this demand for sustainable products. Among the different customers groups, teenagers play a considerable role: Sustainability is particularly important for the younger generations. Children and teenagers of today are going to have to cope with the consequences of negligence of previous and current generations in protecting the environmental and social situation. It is thus important to understand how children and teenagers perceive the problem, and how they will act as consumers in the future. This paper discusses a project where teenagers were surveyed to find out about the importance of sustainability and quality aspects of products. Electronic entertainment products and clothing products were considered as it is assumed that teenagers mostly spend their pocket money for these two branches of products.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

D. Collado Ruiz, Integration of Design & Environmental Assessment, Universidad, Politécnica de Valencia, Spain

 

REFERENCES
Bovea, M., & Wang, B. (2002). Integration of customer, cost and environmental requirements in product design: an application of green QFD.
Cagno, E., & Trucco, P. (2007). Integrated green and quality function deployment. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 2(1), 64-83.
DiSano, J. (2002). Indicators of Sustainable Development: Guidelines and Methodologies. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
Economic, U. N. D. o., & Affairs, S. (2001). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies: United Nations.
Garvin, D. A. (1984). What Does``Product Quality''Really Mean? MIT Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25-43.
ISO, B. (2005). 9000: 2005 Quality management systems. Fundamentals and vocabulary. British Standards Institution.
Kobayashi, H. (2005). Strategic evolution of eco-products: a product life cycle planning methodology. Research in Engineering Design, 16(1), 1-16.
Masui, K., Sakao, T., Kobayashi, M., & Inaba, A. (2003). Applying quality function deployment to environmentally conscious design. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(1), 90-106.

Downloads

Published

2012-03-31

How to Cite

Ostad-Ahmad-Ghorabi, H. ., & Collado Ruiz, D. (2012). Quality and Sustainability Criteria in Purchase Decisions of Teenagers: Engineering Design. International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.14331/ijfps.2012.330024

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2012): IJFPS

Section

REVIEW ARTICLE

License

Copyright (c) 2020 International Journal of Fundamental Physical Science

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)